Showing posts with label codewurk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label codewurk. Show all posts
18/03/2015
"Mez Breeze embraces the medium of digital writing, producing highly original work with striking visual force. We were impressed by the diversity of her creative practice and her willingness to present daring writing in an accessible way. We think that writers like Mez are redefining contemporary poetry." - Judges for the 2015 Thiel Grant Award for Online Writing.
Labels:
code poetry,
codewurk,
digital writing,
mez,
mezangelle
05/03/2015
[On"Human Readable Messages"] "[A] classic...A sea of linguistic invention: unsurpassed technical innovation in terms of print language. Reading the various passages for the first time I felt I was privy to a new form of expression not merely a creole or amalgam, something really new. Mez is brilliant." - Michael J. Maguire
15/10/2014
"This notion of source code as readable - as creating some outcome regardless of its machinic execution - underlies "codework" and other creative projects. The Internet artist Mez, for instance, has created a language called mezangelle that incorporates formal code and informal speech. Mez's poetry deliberately plays with programming syntax, producing language that cannot be executed, but nonetheless draws on the conventions of programming language to signify."
- Wendy Chun, "Programmed Visions: Software and Memory".
Labels:
code poetry,
codework,
codewurk,
digital writing,
mez
16/06/2014
I've never encountered any1 w the unique joy&delight in [s]language[s] as @netwurker @MezBreezeDesign #liquidpage #wordstorm14 #elit
— Mark C. Marino (@markcmarino) May 30, 2014
Labels:
code poetry,
codework,
codewurk,
mezangelle
08/03/2014
"Mezangelle seems to really take something *from* the code and bring it
into speech, to recognize some element in a nevertheless masculinist
programming language as feminist, as worth freeing from its context and
allowing it to work in some other way..."
- Ebuswell, Critical Code Studies Working Group 2014.
- Ebuswell, Critical Code Studies Working Group 2014.
05/03/2014
"Claes Oldenburg has a sculpture in the form of a giant safety pin. It
isn't a safety pin; it can't be operated like one. It's there to look at
and to be part of the space around the viewer. The fact that it doesn't
work is part of the design, not a defect. Mary Flanagan has a sculpture that is a giant joystick, and is a
functioning joystick that allows people (ideally, more than one) to play
Atari VCS games. It's supposed to work, by design; that's an essential
part of the concept.
So, it makes sense to me to imagine how Mez's codework or Oldenburg's
safety pin would operate if they did work, but to me it is less
reasonable and productive to actually try to engineer a working safety
pin out of the existing sculpture or a working compiler for existing
codework texts."
-Nick Montfort, Critical Code Studies Working Group 2014.
-Nick Montfort, Critical Code Studies Working Group 2014.
Labels:
codework,
codewurk,
coding,
experimental,
mezangelle
02/02/2014
"Mez (aka Mary-Anne Breeze) ties experimental language to
avatar creation and collaborative networking to explore complex and
often contested political and social themes. The originality of her
approach with its rich integration of the various aspects of her praxis
has repercussions beyond aesthetics:
When Breeze transformed herself into
Ms. Post Modernism, she felt obligated to represent that with a
description of a physical act of self-mutilation: cutting out one's face
so that it can be removed and replaced. Today, when Breeze posts to
listservs, she posts under avatars that only exist for a few weeks or a
few days, often reflecting a political or social issue on her mind,
before she finally discards that avatar for a new one. The process of
transforming her identity seems mundane and easy, just as it seems to
anyone else who participates in these online environments long enough.
(Reep)
Mez's precursors in print fiction include Kathy Acker, Among other works, Kathy Acker's Empire of the senseless.
whose surreal and terrible prose seems to have been semantically
dismantled by Mez's more technologically engaged praxis. Both stretch
language and genre until only thin tendrils of reference to mainstream
literature remain. These thin tendrils are even more nebulous in Mez's
case, since she distributes her work, and indeed, shares "ownership" of
her work, in ways that exist beyond the scope of the capitalist print
fiction industry."
- "Language rules" by Geniwate, Electronic Book Review
28/07/2013
"Based heavily in a Derridean universe of words within words, Mez
Breeze's poetics works in an almost antithetical manner. Whereas Derrida
and James Joyce operate fundamentally on a linguistics of implosion (or
compression; portmanteaus and puns), Breeze operates by explosion. It
is easy to dismiss her work as a pastiche on “l33t sp33k” but there is
far more happening here than such a superficial read would avail a
careful critic. By breaking words down into their principle parts, Mez
operates on a principle of addition as opposed to subtraction...So instead of a linear read, you have a poetics which trains the reader
to confront it with a sense of simultaneity. That is to say, these poems
are often easier to read if you process them holistically (in this
sense, to take them as a whole) rather than moving from a beginning to
an end as you would with a typical English sentence...
Other various strategies she employs is the extensive use of code operators such as + and &. Brackets, braces, and parenthesis provide further elaboration. In essence, where Derrida and Joyce employed reduction, Mez employs expansion, and the effect (in my opinion) is not only brilliant, but exclusive to Mezangelle."
-Rollie Bollocks in "Mezangelle: A Reading Strategy".
Other various strategies she employs is the extensive use of code operators such as + and &. Brackets, braces, and parenthesis provide further elaboration. In essence, where Derrida and Joyce employed reduction, Mez employs expansion, and the effect (in my opinion) is not only brilliant, but exclusive to Mezangelle."
-Rollie Bollocks in "Mezangelle: A Reading Strategy".
28/05/2012
"Mez Breeze's new book is called "Human Readable Messages." So perhaps
a distinction needs to be made between human-readable glitches and
machine-readable glitches. Human-readable glitches are media glitches
-- they occur when humans are communicating to humans through
machines which mediate this communication. Human-readable glitches
don't freak machines out. But neither do machine-readable glitches.
Machine-readable glitches may crash machines, but that doesn't freak
machines out, because machines have no sentient expectation of
"normal." Machines lack the ability to have an uncanny experience. So
to limit the discussion of glitches to events that only happen within
machinic systems, glitches which never run on or involve human
bodies, is to talk about something quite limited. Because a machine
can't know or experience a glitch. Only a human can."
27/05/2012
"In Mez's work, the digital poet combines code and
language to create, what she calls, mezangelle. She uses mezangelle
throughout her...hypertext pieces called Datableeding... Upon
the entry of Datableeding one is faced with the option of going through
the poetic journey in chronological order or starting with a number and
theme...Starting with the
Electroduction, the user is asked to type in a secret name and then the
journey begins. This is where the user gets to see the mezangelle in
action...A real test for the brain occurs once the
user clicks on one of the hyperlinks inside the box of .THE CON.SOUL.E...the user is presented with a poetic set of words that disappear
once the cursor is moved over a different name section and yet again the
text is completely changed to reveal a different meaning. In next
section Cloh!neing god N Angel-z the user is stimulated with audio and
visual of images of angles being copied onto the screen as if being
scanned by a copy machine."
- Keith Whittaker in Media Art Histories and Genealogies.
- Keith Whittaker in Media Art Histories and Genealogies.
Labels:
codewurk,
experimental,
mezangelle
30/01/2011
"I cannot help but to think of Netwurker Mez, whose primary coding language, Mezangelle, is used to create code-poetry that typically does not compile. The plethora of literary techniques invoked in Mezangelle make her work particularly accessible to people whose backgrounds tend to be less on the programming side of CCS. I like to think of her coding practices as closely related to obfuscation, though more in the literary sense than functional sense, if you subscribe to that dichotomy.
For non-coders who are intimidated by the second C in CCS, or anyone unfamiliar with Mez's work, I suggest testing the waters with some examples of interpretive readings that have been performed on Mez's code-poetry. Rita Raley has performed a very insightful reading on Mez's work. Another interesting reading of Mezangelle...can be found here."-Max Feinstein, HASTACH Code Critiques CCS Forum
Labels:
code poetry,
codework,
codewurk
17/01/2011
"In addition to the infiltration of the abbreviated language of email and text messaging into mainstream print media, it is now also commonplace to encounter programming keywords, symbols, operators, indentation, and pagination entwined with natural, non-technical, mother tongue expressions. Codework is the term associated with the literary and rhetorical practice of mixing human and computer languages (Hayles; Raley; Cramer). Types of codework span from intentionally arranged constructions intended for human consumption that do not execute on any real computer system, to valid expressions in bona fide programming languages that are meaningful to both human and machine readers. Examples of the former include the work of Mez (Mary-Anne Breeze)..."
-John Bork, University of Central Florida, "From Codework to Working Code: A Programmer's Approach to Digital Literacy".
-John Bork, University of Central Florida, "From Codework to Working Code: A Programmer's Approach to Digital Literacy".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)