"Mezangelle seems to really take something *from* the code and bring it
into speech, to recognize some element in a nevertheless masculinist
programming language as feminist, as worth freeing from its context and
allowing it to work in some other way..."
- Ebuswell, Critical Code Studies Working Group 2014.
08/03/2014
05/03/2014
"Claes Oldenburg has a sculpture in the form of a giant safety pin. It
isn't a safety pin; it can't be operated like one. It's there to look at
and to be part of the space around the viewer. The fact that it doesn't
work is part of the design, not a defect. Mary Flanagan has a sculpture that is a giant joystick, and is a
functioning joystick that allows people (ideally, more than one) to play
Atari VCS games. It's supposed to work, by design; that's an essential
part of the concept.
So, it makes sense to me to imagine how Mez's codework or Oldenburg's
safety pin would operate if they did work, but to me it is less
reasonable and productive to actually try to engineer a working safety
pin out of the existing sculpture or a working compiler for existing
codework texts."
-Nick Montfort, Critical Code Studies Working Group 2014.
-Nick Montfort, Critical Code Studies Working Group 2014.
Labels:
codework,
codewurk,
coding,
experimental,
mezangelle
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)